Military board & fitness-exam records review — against the Schedule of Diseases

The military board records review reads your own discharge summaries, specialist conclusions, lab results and studies against the articles of the Schedule of Diseases (annex to RF Government Decree No. 565): which articles and items relate to your picture, which diagnoses are confirmed by examinations and which are recorded from words only, what the records lack, and which questions to bring to your treating clinician. It serves both conscripts and those who need a fitness category — for contract service or enrollment. The fitness-category decision belongs to the military medical board alone: this is an informational review of your records, not a prediction and not legal advice.

  • paid decodings completed
  • 5–9 minaverage decoding time

Services

What else we decode

Not just this area — upload any data and get a clear breakdown in minutes.

Scope

What the review gives you

  • Schedule of Diseases articles — with quotes

    We show which articles and items of the Schedule of Diseases (current revision) relate to what your records actually say — with verbatim quotes of the normative wording, explained in plain words. The category follows from the item — the degree of functional impairment — not from the diagnosis name, and we show what your records say about exactly that.

  • Your records as the board will read them

    We inventory what you uploaded and honestly assess each document by expertise criteria: is it fresh enough (labs go stale in about a month, imaging in half a year to a year), does its wording carry a degree and stage, is it a specialist's conclusion or a single card entry.

  • Confirmed vs recorded from words

    We sort the findings by evidentiary weight: what is backed by an instrumental study, a measurement or a specialist's conclusion — and what exists only as a mention from your words. That is how a board reads records, and it helps to see your papers through its eyes in advance.

  • What is missing — as concrete actions

    Every gap becomes an action: which test to retake because it went stale, where to ask the doctor to state the degree and functional impairment, which specialist conclusion is absent, which study is referenced but not attached.

  • Ready-made questions for your doctor

    We phrase the questions worth asking at the appointment — so they can be read out verbatim. Few people know how to ask for a “diagnosis with the degree of functional impairment” — we put the right words in your hands.

  • Categories and columns in plain words

    We explain the fitness categories (А, Б, В, Г, Д — including Б3 and Б4) and the Schedule's columns I, II, III: which column is about conscription, which about contract service, and which applies to your situation.

How it works

Three steps to a clear result

  1. Upload your data

    Take a photo of a test or scan, upload a PDF — or just describe your symptoms. Several files at once, no sign-up.

  2. AI analyses everything

    It reads test values and findings on images and checks them against reference ranges. For tests from different dates, it tracks the trend.

  3. A clear result

    What’s normal, what’s off and what it means — in plain language, with advice on which doctor to see.

Useful materials

Related articles and parameters — normal ranges, interpretation and causes of abnormalities.

Ask AI about health

FAQ

Questions about fitness categories and the Schedule of Diseases

  • Five: А — fit; Б — fit with minor limitations (with sub-indices such as Б3 and Б4); В — limited fitness, not conscripted in peacetime; Г — temporarily unfit; Д — unfit. The category is assigned by the military medical board under the Schedule of Diseases — based on what the records confirm.
  • Three columns of the same table under which one article yields different categories for different people: column I — initial registration and conscription, column II — non-officer service, column III — contract personnel and officers. The same diagnosis can mean «В» for a conscript and «Б» for a contract soldier. The review shows the column that matches the situation you describe.
  • Because the category follows from the ITEM of an article — the degree of functional impairment and its documented confirmation — not from the diagnosis name. The board looks at what degree is stated, what confirms it and whether follow-up is documented. That is precisely what the review shows: what your records say about the degree — and where they say nothing.
  • Any genuine medical records: hospital discharge summaries, specialist conclusions, outpatient-card pages, lab results, studies and their reports (MRI, CT, X-ray, ultrasound, ECG), certificates. What matters is freshness, completeness of wording (degree, stage, functional impairment) and that a medical organisation issued it. Upload everything you have — the review shows what works and what to refresh.
  • A practical rule of expertise: lab tests — about a month; instrumental studies (MRI, ultrasound, X-ray) — half a year to a year; specialist conclusions — the fresher the better. A stale document may be set aside with a referral to additional examination. The review flags each document's age and says what is worth retaking.
  • The 565 Schedule covers conscription, Ministry of Defence contracts, mobilisation and military colleges — that is what we read against, showing column III for contract cases. MVD and Rosgvardia boards run on their OWN separate schedules, and a weapons permit is a different procedure entirely. For those, the review is useful orientation on your records, not their norm — and the result says so honestly.
  • No — and distrust anyone who promises to: the decision belongs to the board alone, and «guaranteed category» offers are a mark of a dishonest service. We do something else: we show what your records already say, in the language the board will read them in — which articles relate, what is confirmed, what is missing.
  • The current revision of the Schedule of Diseases (annex to the Regulation on military medical expertise, Decree No. 565 of 04.07.2013 as amended). Article texts are quoted verbatim from the norm, and the revision date is shown right in the result and in the PDF.
  • Several AI models read your records independently, then an arbiter reconciles the readings into one result — stray perception errors get filtered out and disputed points are re-checked against the documents themselves. You receive: an inventory of your records with a fitness-for-purpose read, the Schedule articles with quotes, the confirmed-vs-mentioned split, an action list and questions for your doctor — plus a PDF to bring to the appointment or the board.
  • The review is a reading of your own medical records in the terms of an open normative act — the same work we do with lab results. We do not advise how to evade service, help exaggerate or conceal anything, or predict the board's decision — the service has no such functions. Understanding your own records is lawful; half our users want the opposite — to confirm fitness for a contract or enrollment.

Online decoding

Start your decoding now

Upload a photo or PDF — no sign-up, results in minutes.

The service is informational and not intended to diagnose emergency, oncological or psychiatric conditions. For acute symptoms, call emergency services (112).